Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Proof of a man who think with his dick?

To Wilson Wong who wrote 'Time to replace marriage with a cohabitation contract?' (Today, 23 Aug), did you think before you write?

First, salute to you! Brave of you to put your name to your essay after you wrote about seemingly the most solid proof so far on how man falls prey to his own dick!

Anyway, do you know that men, regardless of their age, will squeeze their brain dry just to find some stupid excuse to stray? Young men blame it on high sex drive, middle-age men blame it on the fading sexuaility of wives, old men blame it on ego. Why not face it? And admit that men just have bad sense of responsibilty and are led around by women/their dick.

Wives are the main course of factor why husbands stray (like what you said). Wives are women.
Young, pretty girls are the main course of factor why older men stray (like what you said). Girls are women.

Don't men have a brain capable of choosing and deciding for themselves?

Three cheers to Boon Chin Aun/Terence Leong (I'm not too sure who wrote which article cause Todayonline lumps a few letters under one single header). Wilson made men seem like they are no better than an animal who does not have the capability or intelligence to make a good deicision and choose his actions.

When one steps into a marriage, it comes with limitations and expectations. The men, as well as the women, know what's in it and fully commit to obey by the unwritten rules. I see no excuse for the men to blame it on the wives. If what Mr Wong says is true, that after childbirth, women lose their sexual drive and are more focus on the children, I see 3 things that Mr Wong may have overlooked just by his words.

1st, obviously he does not fully understood the marraige vow. Did it say in the vow that the man will take care of the woman he marries in sickness and in health, foresaking all others, BUT ONLY IF this woman is sexually compatible to him? No!!!! If you don't understand about the sickness & health part, please understand the 'foresaking all others' part.

2nd, he obviously does not appreciate the wife for her nine months of discomfort going through a pregnancy and belittle the amount of energy it took for the wife to go through labour and childbirth. In a normal marriage, was the man conned into having a child? If no, then why blame the wife for what happened after that due to childbirth? Does he mean that if any woman has the intention to keep her man, then she should not bear a child (for fearing that she may lose her sex appeal after childbirth, you never know if your figure will ever return, not everyone is as rich as Christine Chong to go to Marie France Bodyline, some may have no road of return due to genes. So why risk it!!!).

3rd, he sounded like a father who only cares about his own sexual desire more than about taking care of the upbringing of the kids.

I trully believes he means real when he suggest a cohabitation contract is much better than a marriage. Cos a cohabitation contract fulfills all three situation above. 1) No vows to foresake all others. 2) You don't need to be tied to a woman once YOU THINK she has no sex appeal. 3) And last of all, kids. What kids? They are responisbilities of the one whom I have salvaged, who has no more sex appeal. I'll go find another one who is sexier (and of course most likely the one who has not gone through childbirth). Anyway, my focus is not on the kids, nor on my wife, it's on my own sexual desire.

And please don't mention about the nature of men to want to sow his seeds. Sowing seeds normally comes with nurturing and care taking. The way you do it with your seeds, it's more appropriately termed with the word 'dispersing'!

'Disperse' - distribute loosely (http://wordwebonline.com/en/DISPERSE)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home